The real advantage is that you can then really play the light show on a piano and just record it (if your MIDI sequencer supports this, but this should be the case for every sequencer normally), if your sequencer supports this, you can also record fades using CC channels for instance if you have some controllers with faders to do so, I once saw a video about a professional show that was driven that way where MIDI was sent by Ableton Live to a GrandMA2 console. This is maybe a disadvantage and also the MIDI resolution is 128 steps instead of 256 steps (DMX) - an alternative would be OSC instead of midi which is not limited to 128 steps. Mapping MIDI is quite easy, you would have to create a slider for each DMX-Channel that you want to control on the virtual workspace and assign the MIDI input to it, I'm not sure if QLC+ supports note velocities for the sliders, so if not you would have to use another software in between to convert the note on velocity to a control change message. Is the Show function as hard to use as I think, or did I miss something? The advantage is that I don't have to run multiple programs to get around the sync issue, and I'm betting it will be more reliable.Ģ. There's a lot of clicking around, but then again, I might be doing it wrong. Having created some functions with 15 lights in each, I think this will require alot of work compared to the MIDI-method. The drawback is that I need a third party playing a MIDI-file (or even worse, having my sequencer running non-stop for a month).Īs far as I can see, I have to create different Functions and trigger them in the "step sequencer" in QLC+. This has the advantage of giving me easy but total control of each light as well as of already defined Effects. I don't really know how to do that, but I guess I can use the Layout and map custom buttons to MIDI there. Editing MIDI is very easy, especially if I can map one note and it's velocity to a specific channel and level. That may give me a fairly good control over each light. I'll see if I have understood it correctly: It works the same if you want to match a sequence to a melody instead to beats.Ī Screenshot of this is in the Attachement.Īs far as I see I have two options, and they both have different strengths and drawbacks. I always set the timing to be "per step", so you can use the average BPM and then just nudge some single steps that got offbeat. This works the fastest for constant BPM songs but it works also quite fast for human played songs with fluctuating BPM. I used the waveform display of the track for orientation, placed a sequence at the first beat, then I created some steps of the sequence, copied them (sometimes reordered them randomly) and used the timing control to match the sequence to the beats that could be seen on the waveform. If you're already used to MIDI sequencers it's maybe the best option to do it using the sequencer and MIDI input in QLC+ when it works fine for you.īut QLC+ also has a show editor which is quite comparable to a MIDI sequencer track (however operated a bit different) and I've programmed some shows for my nephew using it, but you don't play it live, you can create some light sequences in the show editor directly and use the timing (fade in time, fade out time, duration) of a time step to match it to the music. What's the easiest way to make some lights blink synced to music?Īs far as I know (I'm pretty sure) it's not possible to record a timed sequence ( That's quite the same question) but I think it's a nice idea. Or am I missing some cool functions in QLC+? I don't see anything resembling a "record" button in QLC+, so perhaps I should just keep it MIDI and play it from my sequencer. Repeat alot of time, and then you have a song. My inital idea was to bind various functions and each light individually to a key on my MIDI-keyboard and just "play" long with the music. And perhaps it does, I just can't figure it out. I thought QLC+ would give me some of the same options. I have a little studio in my basement, and I'm used to multitrack recording and MIDI-editing. I've gotten some lights, RGB strips, a DMX-King controller and some DMX receivers. We do have a "smarthouse" which I've spent the last 7-8 years tuning, and my daughters (2 and 4) thought our regular Christmas lights last year "were so booring". I'm no professional in controlling lights or anything.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |